Negativity in modern Western world due to the bible.

-
The bible was written by misogynistic men, who didn't know half the things we know today.

And yet Christians will defend it.

Patriarchal gender roles from passages like Eph. 5:22 ("wives submit") still shape debates on equality and family structures in parts of the West. 

Biblical slavery regulations were historically cited to defend exploitation, with echoes in modern inequality arguments. 

Leviticus/Romans texts on homosexuality fuel ongoing cultural and legal tensions around LGBTQ+ rights. 

Original sin ideas contribute to guilt/shame dynamics in psychology and self-worth narratives. 

Secularism has pushed back hard, but these threads linger subtly. Context and interpretation vary widely.

- "Eye for an eye" retributive justice shaping harsher criminal sentencing debates over rehabilitation.
- Romans 13's "submit to authorities" cited to defend unchecked government power or military actions.
- Genesis dominion mandate fueling resistance to strong environmental regulations.
- New Testament blood/guilt motifs contributing to historical antisemitism's cultural echoes.
- Hellfire imagery amplifying fear-based politics and mental health stigma around doubt or "sin." 

- 2 Thess 3:10 used against welfare programs, prioritizing work over aid. 
- Prov 13:24 justifying corporal punishment in child-rearing debates. 
- Revelation end-times fueling policy fatalism and anti-globalism. 
- Pauline hierarchy texts sustaining gender role conservatism. 
- Biblical literalism clashing with scientific consensus on evolution/climate. 

- Conquest narratives (Deut/Joshua) echoed in historical justifications for colonialism and land disputes. 
- 1 Tim 2:12 limiting women's teaching roles, sustaining barriers in churches and conservative politics. 
- Ritual purity laws fostering body shame and "purity culture" in modern evangelical spaces. 
- End-times prophecy fueling doomsday prepper movements and policy fatalism on global issues. 
- Flood story's catastrophe framing sometimes clashing with scientific consensus on geology/climate. 

There's far more. Just ask Grok.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts

Jesus Swept by Dave G

-
Created 28th Jan 2026. 2199 views.  Last updated 11:00 on #Caturday March 14th 2026. If you enjoy reading this please repost/retweet the post that brought you here. It helps get the message out that religion and christianity has had its day. Also, I've now got a YouTube channel with a few videos featuring The British Atheist Cat's Liberation Front, who mission is to time travel back to between 30 and 33ad to put jesus out of his misery, plus more. Click here   to visit. Before I get started, I'd like to tell you that this blog contains facts and satirical humour, and also help if the religious would like to break free from the mental chains.      I've done quite a bit of research so please read it first then comment at the bottom of the blog, or contact me on twitter (click >  @laurastrilyx ).     Try not to just dismiss it out of hand, or you'll burn in hell for an eternity, which is a sound enough punishment even for the sligh...
Read more

Christianity and science

-
Science theory: Historically, Christianity did not significantly hold back science and often acted as a patron of scientific advancement. While incidents like the Galileo affair represent conflict, the narrative of constant, innate opposition (the "warfare thesis") is considered a modern myth.     Many early scientists were driven by a Christian worldview that promoted understanding nature.  Key insights on the relationship between Christianity and science include: Support for Knowledge: The Medieval Church fostered intellectual pursuits, and many early universities were founded by the Church. Scientific Worldview: The belief in a rational creator fostered the idea that the universe followed orderly, discoverable laws. Significant Contributions: Devout Christians played crucial roles in the Scientific Revolution. Nuanced Conflicts: Historical disagreements, such as those involving Galileo, often involved complex political and intellectual disputes rather than ...
Read more

Evolution

-
Humans did not have ancestors called Adam and Eve. We evolved over millions of years. We did not replace monkeys, we branched from a common ancestor. There is a sixty second video on YouTube here - Human evolution in under 60 seconds . Going back to the start: There is no such thing as micro evolution - things evolve at different speeds, since some animals and plants are as adapted to their environment as they need to be, eg. crocodiles and alligators. I asked Grok for details on human evolution, from coming down from the trees, to why all of our common ancestors didn't turn into humans, to why we have back ache and what the next 300,000 tears could hold for humans terms of evolving, but he won't let me copy text out now so I put it through chatgpt: For a very long time our ancestors lived among branches. Not as the apes we know today, but as creatures that shared a similar life. Small groups moved through forests that once covered great stretches of Afr...
Read more